Saturday, May 8, 2010
Thursday, May 6, 2010
Free Watching Groping In The Bus/train
Wideleg of the "Ex-Wahhabis" Esam Al-Emad (Abdul-Majus)
refutation of the lies told by the agents of the Rafidah Republic of Iran Ex-Zaidi Esam Al-Emad, who would probably overbid Al-Tijan in lying (which is great to be) is lying, and his life biography up to now so conspicuous and lies, that one wonders just be:
Rawafid think the people of the Sunnah are so naive to take seriously at all the lies of the Rawafid? Now, who is Esam Al-Emad? Esam Al-Emad himself claims of a "Wahhabi" to come home, where he then as students (!) Shaykh Ibn Baz (former Grand Mufti of Saudi Arabia), a strict "Wahhabi" was and books against (!) Amir Al-Mu'minin Ali Ibn Abi Talib (RA) wrote and is then converted to Rafidah religion. The little after this (which it spread everywhere) history, (especially the part where he has a book against Ali (RA) wrote) introduction, even the most ignorant of the Sunnah Muslim knows that something must be lazy write (even at Rawafid), is not surprising, for what true Sunni / Salafi would ever even a whole book against the prince of believers Ali (RA)?
We know that the Rawafid muhkam the (unique) statements of scholars of the Sunnah as Ibn Taymiyyah disregard (where he praised Ali and the Ahl Al-Bayt whole again, and like all scholars of the highest Sunnah, it explains a part of the deen, that the Ahl Al-Bayt must love. See his work Aqeedah Al-Wasitiyyah) and Mutashabih (ambiguous, torn from the context) statements of the scholars (especially take Ibn Taymiyyah) to "prove" these are the Ahl Al-Sunnah Nawasib (enemies of the Ahl Al-Bayt). But not even the Rawafid have even to this day asserts her arch-enemy (according to them the father of Nasibis!) Shaykh al-Islam Abu'l-Abbas Ibn Taymiyyah (RH) a whole work, has written to any of the Ahl Al-Bayt (RA), however, a Noname "Nasibi" just a whole book against Ali Ibn Abi Talib (RA) have written. This is nothing but a lie is (no matter if the Rafida Safawi government his alleged book printed for him and then determined yet with Saudi Emblem), should any honest people be aware, because Ali (RA) is one of the most important and greatest Companions, no Rather, among the very best, to the lifetime has already been promised paradise. It is enough to mention that the so-called greatest scholars of the Sunnah, such as Shaykh Al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah, Ibn Al-Qayyim and Ibn Mohammad wrote Abdil-Wahhab whole works through the love for Ahl Al-Bayt (the conviction of two Extremes, the Shia and the Rawafid Nasibah).
Examples:
So, every Muslim with a background would at this set of obvious Luege ellen this alleged "Ex-Wahhabi/Sunni" Emad Al-Shaikh named the same, that this "ex-Wahhabi" Shaykh is as a cheater and Jahil, as was the embarrassing clown and ex-Sufi, the Al-Tijani Mushrik and ( the Mushrik Atatürk praises democracy and ALL his works have been refuted ). These will lie mostly from their own Rafiditischen infantry blind consistently given absorbed and geglauben (mist non-Arabs, non-Arabic speakers, it can check anyway themselves and rely on other parties are), since these are the horror stories of the Nawasib and "Wahhabis" are indoctrinated from childhood, and indeed many believe Rawafid that the People of the Sunnah (particularly the Saudis Hanbali), the Ahl Al-Bayt hate and are in Saudi Arabia in the book shelves books like "we hate Ali Wahhabis" etc.
repays was already clear from the outset is the Esam a liar, and this not only after he came out big (by the PR Rafidah Republic of Iran) but even then, embarrassingly, where he claimed a student (!) Shaykh Bin Baz '(RH) be. Neither the Islamic University in Riyadh, nor any other students of Shaykh knew only his name! Let alone that he was a student. But here's the hypocrisy Rafiditische: The only wrong is what he has attended lectures of the Shaykh PUBLIC. These are available for any Ali Ahmad and from around the world, as public! (To make the lie believable) Only a charlatan would it the "I had students from the Salafi Mufti" invent.
But that's not all! It would be just that, then one could still say. "Ok, he was not a student, but he was" Wahhabi "If not for the uncle's family of Esam (which are mostly Zaydi, partly Sunnah) these lies have been discovered by him and have noted that every Yemeni Al-Emad know the origin of his family (not complete strain), Ur-Zaydis are!
Witness:
Emad Al-uncle Abdul Rahman Al-Emad confirmed the Esam a liar and ex-Zaydi was
This does not stop, "zufaelligerweise" another family member says exactly the same actions (Emad is a liar, ex-Zaydi), this time:
The son of his uncle (paternal), Dr. Ahmad Al-Emad Adil says what all know, namely the Esam is a liar and ex-Zaydi!
also circulated a cut debate around the Internet (to be aware of without the embarrassment) where the Miskin Rawafid celebrate and declare himself the slave of the Majus (Al-Emad) as the "winner" in the Debate with Shaykh Othman Al-Khamis. Here some refutations :
truth about the debate:
About Al-Emad Al-Majusis Lueger :
Last but not least: Here the complete recording of the debate (for years for the Arabic-speaking space available! ) with this failed Mushrik Rafidi Al-Emad (between him and Shaykh Al-Khamis.
المناظرة مع عصام العماد - الرافضي
The site is one of the biggest anti-Rafidah sites in the world who can Arabic, will ensure can what liars Al-Emad, and how the Shaikh was declared as "losers" because he did after the debate, first withdrew completely from debates (he explains this by arguing that since Tijani, Najdi and Jahil Al-Emad, de Rawafid his heart, all of them failed, first wants to concentrate on his studies). Also, the logic says that one of the largest sites Arabichen surely do not offer this debate (!) Would, if the Rafidi Al-Emad yet so offnkundig "won". to speak for Luet of knowledge and those who do can enjoy the Arabic language, it will be obvious times, like Emad Al-lied and failed. Our Blog recommends cookshops all Muslims are Munadhara to hear this. 
Rawafid think the people of the Sunnah are so naive to take seriously at all the lies of the Rawafid? Now, who is Esam Al-Emad? Esam Al-Emad himself claims of a "Wahhabi" to come home, where he then as students (!) Shaykh Ibn Baz (former Grand Mufti of Saudi Arabia), a strict "Wahhabi" was and books against (!) Amir Al-Mu'minin Ali Ibn Abi Talib (RA) wrote and is then converted to Rafidah religion. The little after this (which it spread everywhere) history, (especially the part where he has a book against Ali (RA) wrote) introduction, even the most ignorant of the Sunnah Muslim knows that something must be lazy write (even at Rawafid), is not surprising, for what true Sunni / Salafi would ever even a whole book against the prince of believers Ali (RA)?
We know that the Rawafid muhkam the (unique) statements of scholars of the Sunnah as Ibn Taymiyyah disregard (where he praised Ali and the Ahl Al-Bayt whole again, and like all scholars of the highest Sunnah, it explains a part of the deen, that the Ahl Al-Bayt must love. See his work Aqeedah Al-Wasitiyyah) and Mutashabih (ambiguous, torn from the context) statements of the scholars (especially take Ibn Taymiyyah) to "prove" these are the Ahl Al-Sunnah Nawasib (enemies of the Ahl Al-Bayt). But not even the Rawafid have even to this day asserts her arch-enemy (according to them the father of Nasibis!) Shaykh al-Islam Abu'l-Abbas Ibn Taymiyyah (RH) a whole work, has written to any of the Ahl Al-Bayt (RA), however, a Noname "Nasibi" just a whole book against Ali Ibn Abi Talib (RA) have written. This is nothing but a lie is (no matter if the Rafida Safawi government his alleged book printed for him and then determined yet with Saudi Emblem), should any honest people be aware, because Ali (RA) is one of the most important and greatest Companions, no Rather, among the very best, to the lifetime has already been promised paradise. It is enough to mention that the so-called greatest scholars of the Sunnah, such as Shaykh Al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah, Ibn Al-Qayyim and Ibn Mohammad wrote Abdil-Wahhab whole works through the love for Ahl Al-Bayt (the conviction of two Extremes, the Shia and the Rawafid Nasibah).
Examples:
you see only the books / chapters in the works of the Sunnah and Others who have the following titles:
-
"The excellent features Ali (فضائل علي) etc." Imam Al-Bukhari and Muslim (This great scholar of the Sunnah have the status of the Ahl Al-Bayt yes undermine so much that they sometimes just each one of them, so Al-Hussayn, Fatimah etc. have devoted whole chapters to its properties of interest, which quoted the Rafidah so much)
-
"The major characteristics (Ahl Al-Bayt) (الخصائص الكبرى) " - at Al-Nisai
-
"The excellent features of Fatima" - Al-Suyuti
-
"Musnad Ahl Al-Bayt ridwanullahi alayhim ajmain (مسند أهل البيت رضوان الله عليهم أجمعين) Imam Ahmad Ibn Hanbal in (which see the Salafiyah in the Arabian Peninsula than their Grundmathhab, So as you can see the Hanabilah and Imam Ahmad has devoted an entire chapter to do for the entire Ahl Al-Bayt (ra).
-
" Huquq Ahl Al-Bayt bayn Al-Sunnah wa Al-Shia - A book about the excellent features of the Ahl Al -Bayt (ra) by no less than Ibn Taymiyyah (rh). In this work he praises the Ahl Al-Bayt and speaks freely of their offentslichtlichen enemies (the Nawasib) and the second type of enemy, Rafidah, the Shia, their claim. Both will be sentenced and represent the Shaykh explains how the people of the Sunnah in the middle between these two extremes. He also praised Al-Hussayn in Minhaj Al-Sunnah and cursed all those responsible for his murder.
-
Al-Bidaya wa Al-Nihayah - The event of Karbala by none other than the student Ibn Kathir, the authentic traditions collected regarding the tragic event of Ashura and has condemned both parties of the Bida has, once the Nasibis, the open enemies of the Ahl Al-Bayt and once the Rafidi Shias, who made a show of love for the Ahl al-Bayt and Kufr teachings spread in their name and thus not less enemies the Ahl Al-Bayt are. Including catches Ibnu Kathir in his work with the following beautiful lines: "Every Muslim should mourn for the assassination Al-Hussayns radhiallahu anhu, for he is a leader of Muslims and a scholar of the Sahabah [...] But there is nothing good in what the Rafidah (Shia) do [...]
-
Mawqifu min Aal Al-Bayt al-Salam alayhim by Muhammad Abdul-Wahhab (the nightmare Rafidah) am. This is the work of the position of Ahl Al-Bayt in the people Sunnah (written by Ibn Abdul-Wahhab, who was also known under name Abu Ali , the father Ali and since it is customary at Arabs to their children after which the you love very much, the Shaykh has taken a hold of his idols, that is Ali Ibn Abi Talib (ra). on here ended but not because he has named his other two sons Al-Hassan and Al-Hussayn and his daughter Fatimah, he called . Khalid Al-Zahrani in this book describes the love bin Abdul-Wahhab for the Ahl Al-Bayt and he explains that love is not just mere lip service was, but rather because it is a branch of the faith, this (Ahl Al-Bayt) to love and take all of them authentic (and not the lies and the Kufriyat the Rafidah attribute to them, just as the Kufriyat the Nasara Jesus (as) to write. This proves that Muhammad bin Abdul-Wahhab (which the Rafidah illegally as "Nasibi" (enemy of Ahl Al-Bayt) call) strictly held to the Shariah of Islam and the Messenger ( sallallahu alayhi wa ala aalihi wa sallam ) followed and the words of the Ahl Al-Bayt is respected, the following Hadith:
Abu Al-Al-Assadi Hiyaaj said: " Ali ibn said Abi Talib me
"Should send out I do not with the same duty with me (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) and the Messenger of Allah also sent ? Leave no Stutue without destroying it and let no established (in the amount Built) grave, are not there to make gene flattened (According to a tradition. " And leave no image without it wipe ).
[Sahih Muslim]
Truly, would the real Rafidah Ali (ra) meet today to break with his huge beard and his command of the built tombs, they would call him, no doubt as "Wahhabis". But what would have Abal-Hassan heutemit make Rawafid, which are one step further and green-lighted shrines of gold and giant mausoleums on behalf of the Ahl Al-Bayt built. Truly, what would he say if he still wanted to destroy already in the air, built shrines, but the exact practices all idolaters are similar worldwide, be they Hindus, Buddhists, Catholics / Orthodox, or even the extremist Sufis in the name of the Sunnah something introduced)
agent of the Iranian Majus.
So, every Muslim with a background would at this set of obvious Luege ellen this alleged "Ex-Wahhabi/Sunni" Emad Al-Shaikh named the same, that this "ex-Wahhabi" Shaykh is as a cheater and Jahil, as was the embarrassing clown and ex-Sufi, the Al-Tijani Mushrik and ( the Mushrik Atatürk praises democracy and ALL his works have been refuted ). These will lie mostly from their own Rafiditischen infantry blind consistently given absorbed and geglauben (mist non-Arabs, non-Arabic speakers, it can check anyway themselves and rely on other parties are), since these are the horror stories of the Nawasib and "Wahhabis" are indoctrinated from childhood, and indeed many believe Rawafid that the People of the Sunnah (particularly the Saudis Hanbali), the Ahl Al-Bayt hate and are in Saudi Arabia in the book shelves books like "we hate Ali Wahhabis" etc.
repays was already clear from the outset is the Esam a liar, and this not only after he came out big (by the PR Rafidah Republic of Iran) but even then, embarrassingly, where he claimed a student (!) Shaykh Bin Baz '(RH) be. Neither the Islamic University in Riyadh, nor any other students of Shaykh knew only his name! Let alone that he was a student. But here's the hypocrisy Rafiditische: The only wrong is what he has attended lectures of the Shaykh PUBLIC. These are available for any Ali Ahmad and from around the world, as public! (To make the lie believable) Only a charlatan would it the "I had students from the Salafi Mufti" invent.
But that's not all! It would be just that, then one could still say. "Ok, he was not a student, but he was" Wahhabi "If not for the uncle's family of Esam (which are mostly Zaydi, partly Sunnah) these lies have been discovered by him and have noted that every Yemeni Al-Emad know the origin of his family (not complete strain), Ur-Zaydis are!
Witness:
Emad Al-uncle Abdul Rahman Al-Emad confirmed the Esam a liar and ex-Zaydi was
This does not stop, "zufaelligerweise" another family member says exactly the same actions (Emad is a liar, ex-Zaydi), this time:
The son of his uncle (paternal), Dr. Ahmad Al-Emad Adil says what all know, namely the Esam is a liar and ex-Zaydi!
also circulated a cut debate around the Internet (to be aware of without the embarrassment) where the Miskin Rawafid celebrate and declare himself the slave of the Majus (Al-Emad) as the "winner" in the Debate with Shaykh Othman Al-Khamis. Here some refutations :
truth about the debate:
About Al-Emad Al-Majusis Lueger :
Last but not least: Here the complete recording of the debate (for years for the Arabic-speaking space available! ) with this failed Mushrik Rafidi Al-Emad (between him and Shaykh Al-Khamis.
المناظرة مع عصام العماد - الرافضي
The site is one of the biggest anti-Rafidah sites in the world who can Arabic, will ensure can what liars Al-Emad, and how the Shaikh was declared as "losers" because he did after the debate, first withdrew completely from debates (he explains this by arguing that since Tijani, Najdi and Jahil Al-Emad, de Rawafid his heart, all of them failed, first wants to concentrate on his studies). Also, the logic says that one of the largest sites Arabichen surely do not offer this debate (!) Would, if the Rafidi Al-Emad yet so offnkundig "won". to speak for Luet of knowledge and those who do can enjoy the Arabic language, it will be obvious times, like Emad Al-lied and failed. Our Blog recommends cookshops all Muslims are Munadhara to hear this.
Tuesday, May 4, 2010
Can Tattoos Give One Meningitis
characteristics of Allah (SWT) - "stings like a monkey" - (Mushrik-Markt.de Luege)
We had already drawn attention in a our previous posts on the lies of the Rawafid (plural of Rafidi). Our dear brother of "Gift2Shias" has made it his mission to uncover one of their biggest liar and his lies, "Al-Muraja'at" and to show what a liar but this was Rafidi priest. >> HERE \u0026lt;\u0026lt; the article. Well, we are called by a brother to a particular part of another work this "ayatollahs" of Rafidah, "Allamah" Abdul-Hussayn Sharif Al-Din Al-Musawi encountered, which (as already reported by us) are so busy, Abu Hurayrah portray as a liar. One answer and the complete refutation of his work is in Arabic and a brief summary of it in German, which could help her >> here \u0026lt;\u0026lt;.
Both of his works, that is the "Al-Muraja'at" Luegenwerk and also showed the same set Luegenwerk Numero Zwo, say, "Abu Huraira cause and effect of a tradition" by the famous Mushrik market ("market-Muslim, de ") offered to individuals and behind the facade heuschlerichen of "unity between Sunnis and Shiites" are sometimes just as the estimated personalities of Sunnah depicted as a liar and still on the insidious manner, that is full of slander and breathtaking Textverfaelschungen .
The summit lies and audacity, and proof that Rafidah mushrikun, the enemies of Islam, Tawhid and Sunnah, nothing below but leave nothing to the Ahl Al-Sunnah and the companions of the Prophet (SAWS) diffarmieren (and lead to truly ignorant Shia astray) to slander and we will show in the following part of the German Muslim-market "translation. You will see that these Rawafid not shy away once before to fake it to all parts of a hadith Abu Hurayrah (RA) and attributed to the people of the Sunnah.
Rafidah also bring" evidence ", namely the site at the market de-Mushrik, >> here \u0026lt;\u0026lt; their proof. Now before that portion of the website with the "evidence" suddenly " goes offline, we want to schonmal now for the future do a scan to make sure all of what is available after Rafidah statement in the Sahih of Imam Al-Bukhari (RH):
now served, this is the mushrik market and apparently their "Ayatollah" Abdul-Hussayn Sharaf Al-Din Al-Musawi, the reader with no criminal record, Sunnah, Shia and non-Muslim. People have a sick heart, are likely to pay before their "Ayatollahs" and her "Muslim market," follow it blindly-way and the written believe without any checking of the hadith although the Sahih Al-Bukhari already completely into English and many parts of the German translated was. Well, a brother of our attention and we are looking for times to this strange hadith where Allah (SWT) said to have "spikes" and this still like a "monkey" (since when did monkey spines?), Hasha Allah! we concluded the following:
Said Al-Bukhari hadith can selstsamerweise so be found only on German-Rafiditischen pages. That alone should bring any doubt to the truth-seekers, but this is still no evidence, so we researched further.
The result of the rare samenen from the beginning, "Hadith" is this: How
(almost always) lie to Rawafid without red to be. We really wanted them to admit that she, as a follower of mostly Persian "ayatollahs" guided sect certainly not have their strength in the Arabian ... (for example, there is not an audio-tape or one of its biggest Dars "ayatollahs" such as Sistani and there are voices even from Al-Rafidah doubt the fact whether this guru of the Rawafid can at all Arabic.) ... is the lie a hallmark of Al-Rawafid so this excuse (in our view) for them failed but in fairness we quote one to have been sent appeal of a brother who prefers the stupidity of the Rawafid, the deliberate concealment:
Quote his brother:
Well, anyway, the cold Rafidah lied, falsified, cheated, or as our brother simply says in its stupidity and Jahl the Arab language-free run, and translated it so the whole "monkey-thorn" part of the hadith wrong and their blind admirers and supporters (who may indeed not speak Arabic), feel confirmed in their (dis) believe (hatred of Sahaba) and delight (perhaps only to date) against each other on the alleged "Shirk" by Abu Hurayrah and the Ahl Al-Sunnah.
detection of lies:
look on the one stands on what the original hadith and how blatant the Mushrik Rawafid the Hadith have falsified:
Rawafid translation from the Mushrik Market website called Islam-pure de ":
The original in the Hadith:
English: >> sahihalbukhari.com \u0026lt;\u0026lt;
Auszug:
Arabischen: >>el-eman.com<<
The Messenger of Allah peace be upon him, "Thus I have the first permit, and the prayers of the Apostles that day: O God, and has hooks such as forks monkey , As you saw, monkey thorns. "Say" Yes, O Messenger of God. "I like it forks monkey, but they do not know as much as bones but God ,
Uebersetzung:
[...] Der Gesandte Allahs-Friede and salvation be upon him-said: The first to be allowed to speak to the ambassador (Al-Rusul) and her Du'a will be: O Allah! Savior Savior us us! man [the comparison with>> the here! \u0026lt;\u0026lt;] and in it (the hell), there will be hooks, like the thistles / thorns of Al-Sa'daan (a thorny tree) . Have you ever spines (the tree) as seen from Al-Sa'dan? They (Sahaba) said: Yes, O Messenger of Allah. He (the Prophet) said: "To be their (the hell) spines, as the thistles / thorns of Sa'daan be , except their degree no one knows except Allah [...]
result We do not know, should we laugh or cry over Rawafid ? If this translation would be disseminated by any amateur missionary among the Rawafid, then one could understand it still somehow. Here, however, distributed to the largest Rafidi sites (Mushrik market website) a propaganda against an honored Sahabi of the Muslims of Al-Sunnah, and on top of that they distort or very bold by even very curly fluffy disfigure a whole part of the hadith and thus not Abu Hurayrah only in effect accused of lying, but the Prophet (SAWS).
Note Man:
But we know:
or:
Conclusion:
All this should once again be a lesson for every Muslim, say that one should never trust the Rawafid and do what uberpruefen ten times. Because there are only two possibilities in the reference in a conversation with a Rafidi in relation to 'evidence'.
A) Ar-Rafidi brings an authentic hadiths about this, but under exclusion of other Sahih Hadith and the Shuruh (explanations) of the scholars of the Hadith.
B) Not always, but more often they get no red to be unauthentic traditions or even sometimes just enstellte traditions, such as content in our sample with one of the largest Rafidi sites in Germany.
All this has a tradition with them, we remind you of the world-famous website "answering-ansar" An embossed pile of half-knowing non-Arabic-speaking Pakistanis the many glaring Textverfaelschungen have been involved, so that even RELEVANT Shia forums such Shiachat com dot etc. already heated discussions have led at how much still lies of this "Answering-Ansar" (and thus harm the Rafidah more than good) and if at all only the non-Arab readers great quotes and "Sunni References" can impress. Their most glaring were to lie as follows SunniDefense.com refuted that as I said would like to have (honest) Rawafid distance itself from her idols. Now that the case is not limited to the English room, where do they can learn more than just today.
Allahu Al-Musta'aan!
______________
Unfortunately, you are not trotzalldem optimistic and believe that the Rawafid finally let off of their kufr and falsehood, and recognize as their priests and missionaries to lead them astray. Allah (SWT) is the one who tells us about the state of most people and this is that most people hate the truth. Nevertheless, for each of the Shi'i and would like to sincerely understand is how people understand the Sunnah of the attributes of Allah, by Allah never ascribe a body (like the Mujassimah) nor his (SWT) attributes negate as Jahmiah ( and containing the Shia Rafidah), this should take to heart the following Reading and dish out with an open heart on the matter, may Allah to guide us all especially the youth of the Shia.
- LIES: Shirk in the name and properties (Al-Asmaa was wa As-Sifat)
We had already drawn attention in a our previous posts on the lies of the Rawafid (plural of Rafidi). Our dear brother of "Gift2Shias" has made it his mission to uncover one of their biggest liar and his lies, "Al-Muraja'at" and to show what a liar but this was Rafidi priest. >> HERE \u0026lt;\u0026lt; the article. Well, we are called by a brother to a particular part of another work this "ayatollahs" of Rafidah, "Allamah" Abdul-Hussayn Sharif Al-Din Al-Musawi encountered, which (as already reported by us) are so busy, Abu Hurayrah portray as a liar. One answer and the complete refutation of his work is in Arabic and a brief summary of it in German, which could help her >> here \u0026lt;\u0026lt;.
Both of his works, that is the "Al-Muraja'at" Luegenwerk and also showed the same set Luegenwerk Numero Zwo, say, "Abu Huraira cause and effect of a tradition" by the famous Mushrik market ("market-Muslim, de ") offered to individuals and behind the facade heuschlerichen of "unity between Sunnis and Shiites" are sometimes just as the estimated personalities of Sunnah depicted as a liar and still on the insidious manner, that is full of slander and breathtaking Textverfaelschungen .
The summit lies and audacity, and proof that Rafidah mushrikun, the enemies of Islam, Tawhid and Sunnah, nothing below but leave nothing to the Ahl Al-Sunnah and the companions of the Prophet (SAWS) diffarmieren (and lead to truly ignorant Shia astray) to slander and we will show in the following part of the German Muslim-market "translation. You will see that these Rawafid not shy away once before to fake it to all parts of a hadith Abu Hurayrah (RA) and attributed to the people of the Sunnah.
The Rafidah and Mushrik-Markt.de say:
"The Sunnis believe that Allah on the Day of Resurrection spines, as are the spines of a monkey is" This is handed down from your holy Abu Hurayrah of course, look at this Shirk "
Rafidah also bring" evidence ", namely the site at the market de-Mushrik, >> here \u0026lt;\u0026lt; their proof. Now before that portion of the website with the "evidence" suddenly " goes offline, we want to schonmal now for the future do a scan to make sure all of what is available after Rafidah statement in the Sahih of Imam Al-Bukhari (RH):
now served, this is the mushrik market and apparently their "Ayatollah" Abdul-Hussayn Sharaf Al-Din Al-Musawi, the reader with no criminal record, Sunnah, Shia and non-Muslim. People have a sick heart, are likely to pay before their "Ayatollahs" and her "Muslim market," follow it blindly-way and the written believe without any checking of the hadith although the Sahih Al-Bukhari already completely into English and many parts of the German translated was. Well, a brother of our attention and we are looking for times to this strange hadith where Allah (SWT) said to have "spikes" and this still like a "monkey" (since when did monkey spines?), Hasha Allah! we concluded the following:
Said Al-Bukhari hadith can selstsamerweise so be found only on German-Rafiditischen pages. That alone should bring any doubt to the truth-seekers, but this is still no evidence, so we researched further.
The result of the rare samenen from the beginning, "Hadith" is this: How
(almost always) lie to Rawafid without red to be. We really wanted them to admit that she, as a follower of mostly Persian "ayatollahs" guided sect certainly not have their strength in the Arabian ... (for example, there is not an audio-tape or one of its biggest Dars "ayatollahs" such as Sistani and there are voices even from Al-Rafidah doubt the fact whether this guru of the Rawafid can at all Arabic.) ... is the lie a hallmark of Al-Rawafid so this excuse (in our view) for them failed but in fairness we quote one to have been sent appeal of a brother who prefers the stupidity of the Rawafid, the deliberate concealment:
Quote his brother:
I think when they are accused of lying here, that's a flattering overestimate their intellectual abilities, because I think it is far more likely that this is simply the result of sheer stupidity. Just think, that in al-shia.de still firmly believe the first name of Imam al-Bukhari is "Sahih" is. that with a word which can mean monkey thistle or in connection with the prickly attribute the monkey chooses already is a masterpiece that needs to hand it to them.
Well, anyway, the cold Rafidah lied, falsified, cheated, or as our brother simply says in its stupidity and Jahl the Arab language-free run, and translated it so the whole "monkey-thorn" part of the hadith wrong and their blind admirers and supporters (who may indeed not speak Arabic), feel confirmed in their (dis) believe (hatred of Sahaba) and delight (perhaps only to date) against each other on the alleged "Shirk" by Abu Hurayrah and the Ahl Al-Sunnah.
detection of lies:
look on the one stands on what the original hadith and how blatant the Mushrik Rawafid the Hadith have falsified:
Rawafid translation from the Mushrik Market website called Islam-pure de ":
Abu Huraira also said that the Holy Prophet Muhammad (saw) said," Then I will be the first to cross the bridge over Hell, and the prayers of the are prophetic in that day, "O Lord, save, save!" And God will have spikes like the spikes of a monkey. Have you seen the thorns of a monkey "
The original in the Hadith:
English: >> sahihalbukhari.com \u0026lt;\u0026lt;
Auszug:
Nobody except the Apostles will then be able to speak and they will be saying then, 'O Allah! Save us. O Allah Save us.' There will be hooks like the thorns of sa'dan in Hell . Have you seen the thorns of sa'dan?" The people said, "Yes." He said, "These hooks will be like the thorns of sa'dan but nobody except Allah knows their greatness in size
Arabischen: >>el-eman.com<<
Auszug:
The Messenger of Allah peace be upon him, "Thus I have the first permit, and the prayers of the Apostles that day: O God, and has hooks such as forks monkey , As you saw, monkey thorns. "Say" Yes, O Messenger of God. "I like it forks monkey, but they do not know as much as bones but God ,
Uebersetzung:
[...] Der Gesandte Allahs-Friede and salvation be upon him-said: The first to be allowed to speak to the ambassador (Al-Rusul) and her Du'a will be: O Allah! Savior Savior us us! man [the comparison with>> the here! \u0026lt;\u0026lt;] and in it (the hell), there will be hooks, like the thistles / thorns of Al-Sa'daan (a thorny tree) . Have you ever spines (the tree) as seen from Al-Sa'dan? They (Sahaba) said: Yes, O Messenger of Allah. He (the Prophet) said: "To be their (the hell) spines, as the thistles / thorns of Sa'daan be , except their degree no one knows except Allah [...]
result We do not know, should we laugh or cry over Rawafid ? If this translation would be disseminated by any amateur missionary among the Rawafid, then one could understand it still somehow. Here, however, distributed to the largest Rafidi sites (Mushrik market website) a propaganda against an honored Sahabi of the Muslims of Al-Sunnah, and on top of that they distort or very bold by even very curly fluffy disfigure a whole part of the hadith and thus not Abu Hurayrah only in effect accused of lying, but the Prophet (SAWS).
Note Man:
- Originally Hadith speaks of the Prophet (SAWS) by Al-Jahannam (the hell).
- The Prophet (SAWS) describes the hell (and not Allah!) as prickly and sets a comparison with a tree among the Arabs (Al-Sa'daan), who in return is known to be prickly .
- The Rawafid have unabashedly translated that Abi Hurayra (RA) narrated that the Prophet (SAWS) said that Allah (SWT) - hashaa - will be "prickly". to confirm
- To their stupidity even more and to underline they have a word which can mean thistle or monkey and in connection with the attribute prickly, the monkeys selected ! That's a feat that let you have them, the Rafidah.
But we know:
or:
"Had the stupidity of a man, it would be a Rafidi."
Conclusion:
All this should once again be a lesson for every Muslim, say that one should never trust the Rawafid and do what uberpruefen ten times. Because there are only two possibilities in the reference in a conversation with a Rafidi in relation to 'evidence'.
A) Ar-Rafidi brings an authentic hadiths about this, but under exclusion of other Sahih Hadith and the Shuruh (explanations) of the scholars of the Hadith.
B) Not always, but more often they get no red to be unauthentic traditions or even sometimes just enstellte traditions, such as content in our sample with one of the largest Rafidi sites in Germany.
All this has a tradition with them, we remind you of the world-famous website "answering-ansar" An embossed pile of half-knowing non-Arabic-speaking Pakistanis the many glaring Textverfaelschungen have been involved, so that even RELEVANT Shia forums such Shiachat com dot etc. already heated discussions have led at how much still lies of this "Answering-Ansar" (and thus harm the Rafidah more than good) and if at all only the non-Arab readers great quotes and "Sunni References" can impress. Their most glaring were to lie as follows SunniDefense.com refuted that as I said would like to have (honest) Rawafid distance itself from her idols. Now that the case is not limited to the English room, where do they can learn more than just today.
Allahu Al-Musta'aan!
______________
Unfortunately, you are not trotzalldem optimistic and believe that the Rawafid finally let off of their kufr and falsehood, and recognize as their priests and missionaries to lead them astray. Allah (SWT) is the one who tells us about the state of most people and this is that most people hate the truth. Nevertheless, for each of the Shi'i and would like to sincerely understand is how people understand the Sunnah of the attributes of Allah, by Allah never ascribe a body (like the Mujassimah) nor his (SWT) attributes negate as Jahmiah ( and containing the Shia Rafidah), this should take to heart the following Reading and dish out with an open heart on the matter, may Allah to guide us all especially the youth of the Shia.
- LIES: Shirk in the name and properties (Al-Asmaa was wa As-Sifat)
Saturday, May 1, 2010
Kiddiw Co2 Detector 999
greeting from the past
stresses in his thesis from the 50's Klafki that in the historical formation "is not about tradition as transmission of knowledge from the past, but about tradition as awareness of the historically understandable trains to mastering the presence . The selection of the results to be remembered, therefore, always new of the tasks of the present and the near future here. "
(The educational problem of the elementary ..., 1964 / 3, p. 450)
stresses in his thesis from the 50's Klafki that in the historical formation "is not about tradition as transmission of knowledge from the past, but about tradition as awareness of the historically understandable trains to mastering the presence . The selection of the results to be remembered, therefore, always new of the tasks of the present and the near future here. "
(The educational problem of the elementary ..., 1964 / 3, p. 450)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)